From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: ata_bmdma_* calls in libata-core.c Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:00:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4201314E.1060502@pobox.com> References: <001001c50960$049a7930$3805040a@internal.synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:20690 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262579AbVBBUA2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:00:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <001001c50960$049a7930$3805040a@internal.synopsys.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mat.Loikkanen@synopsys.com Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Mat Loikkanen wrote: > I suggest all BMDMA calls become callbacks that the driver can set to its > own functions or assign to wrapper functions implemented in libata-core.c > that call the inline functions in libata.h. Should I do this? Yeah, that works for me. Jeff