From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] ide: fix unneeded LBA48 taskfile registers access Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 03:58:08 -0500 Message-ID: <42072DA0.8050302@pobox.com> References: <4206F2E5.7020501@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:52675 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261370AbVBGI6Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 03:58:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4206F2E5.7020501@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Tejun Heo FWIW, there are two limitations of libata in this area: 1) ISTR some PATA vendor-specific commands have a very specific set of input and output registers to use, and input/output sets of registers may differ from each other. 2) libata is lazy, and just reads registers in "groups": the lbaH/M/L/nsect registers, the device register, etc.