linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francois Payette <francoisp@netmosphere.net>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA150TX4 atat1:command timeout
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:04:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <421360ED.2040505@netmosphere.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4211279C.5070205@pobox.com>

With plain vanilla 2.6.11-rc4 the same bug appears after about 250GB 
(avg of 2 trials). With the TBG clock setting line omitted it still 
happens, but after about 1 1 TB (avg of 2 trials, takes about 6hrs per 
trial). Interestingly enough, this change does not slow down the setup, 
it even seems a little faster.

I was mistaken earlier: the 4 drives are not exactly the same, there is 
2 6B200M0 one 6B200S0 and one 6Y200M0. This should be irrelevant as I 
have swapped disks and wires and the problem happens anyway. One 
interesting thing: in init 1 the timeout seems to appear faster, after 
about 200GB in the case with the omission. I would be inclined to think 
this is some sort of a deadlock or race condition: the kernel does not 
dump or panic, it just hangs on pdc_eng_timeout. When we dumped the 
stack  in that function, all we had was pdc_eng_timeout, as there seems 
to a be a separate thread per disk that gets waken up for error handling.

Any ideas on how we can catch this one?
TIA,
Francois

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-16 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-14 21:41 SATA150TX4 atat1:command timeout Francois Payette
2005-02-14 22:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-16 15:04   ` Francois Payette [this message]
2005-02-18 16:40     ` Francois Payette
2005-09-30 10:40       ` Robin Bowes
2005-10-06  9:55         ` Ian Oliver
2005-10-06 10:44           ` Erik Slagter
2005-10-13 20:37             ` Ian Oliver
2005-10-13 21:04               ` Mark Lord
2005-10-14 10:17                 ` Ian Oliver
2005-10-14 13:07                   ` Mark Lord
2005-10-14 10:00               ` Erik Slagter
2005-10-14 16:00                 ` Ian Oliver
2005-10-17 10:08                   ` Erik Slagter
2005-10-17 13:01                     ` Ian Oliver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=421360ED.2040505@netmosphere.net \
    --to=francoisp@netmosphere.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).