From: Ajit Prem <Ajit.Prem@motorola.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: 31244 & sata_vsc & PPC
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:21:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4213F1AA.6060500@motorola.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4213C852.4070105@pobox.com>
It's just a dirty hack that works
for the limited case where I'm
using only 1 disk off port 1 on a
board that makes 3 ports available.
I'm not sure what the side effects
are, or how things will work if
all 3 ports are used (which I'm
unable to test).
Anyway, here's the hack I used:
@@ -174,6 +174,9 @@
if (ap && (!(ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_PORT_DISABLED))) {
struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
+ vsc_sata_scr_write(ap, VSC_SATA_SCR_ERROR_OFFSET, 0x00010001);
+ readl((void *)ap->ioaddr.status_addr);
+
qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, ap->active_tag);
if (qc && (!(qc->tf.ctl & ATA_NIEN)))
handled += ata_host_intr(ap, qc);
Now, on "modprobe sata_vsc", I get:
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xE107C200 ctl 0xE107C229 bmdma 0xE107C270
irq 98
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xE107C400 ctl 0xE107C429 bmdma 0xE107C470
irq 98
ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xE107C600 ctl 0xE107C629 bmdma 0xE107C670
irq 98
ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xE107C800 ctl 0xE107C829 bmdma 0xE107C870
irq 98
ata1: no device found (phy stat 00000000)
scsi0 : sata_vsc
ata2: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/100, 78140160 sectors:
ata2(0): applying bridge limits
ata2: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100
scsi1 : sata_vsc
ata3: no device found (phy stat 00000000)
scsi2 : sata_vsc
ata4: no device found (phy stat 00000000)
scsi3 : sata_vsc
Vendor: ATA Model: FUJITSU MHS2040A Rev : C003
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05
SCSI device sda: 78140160 512-byte hdwr sectors (40008 MB)
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
SCSI device sda: 78140160 512-byte hdwr sectors (40008 MB)
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
sda: sda1 sda2 sda3
Attached scsi disk sda at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0, type 0
I can then fdisk, mount, and use the SATA disk with no problems.
AP
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ajit Prem wrote:
>
>>
>> As a follow-up to my previous email where
>> I indicated that int_status on entry into
>> vsc_sata_interrupt indicates 0x8300, I
>> put in a crude fix in the vsc_sata_interrupt
>> handler to read the taskfile status register,
>> and to clear the appropriate bits in the
>> SATA SError register, and now things work
>> just fine.
>
>
> Wanna post your crude patch to the list?
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-17 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-16 19:05 31244 & sata_vsc & PPC Ajit Prem
2005-02-16 19:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-16 20:51 ` Ajit Prem
2005-02-19 6:01 ` Jeremy Higdon
2005-02-16 21:27 ` Ajit Prem
2005-02-16 22:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-17 1:21 ` Ajit Prem [this message]
2005-02-19 6:02 ` Jeremy Higdon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4213F1AA.6060500@motorola.com \
--to=ajit.prem@motorola.com \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).