From: "Johny Ågotnes" <johny@agotnes.com>
To: Ryan Bourgeois <rgb005@latech.edu>
Cc: Danny Cox <Danny.Cox@ECWeb.com>,
Linux IDE List <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Which SATA Combos To Consider?
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:44:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42153A89.2090909@agotnes.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <421535F6.80609@latech.edu>
Just a quick note on the SX4 Card - I have seen data corruption on
hard-drives too in the simplest possible setup, so I'd stay clear of
that card until further notice.
Mine is sitting in a cupboard right now, awaiting 'someone' (me, if I
get some time to learn low-level kernel drivers) debugging the issue.
Basically, accessing two drives via this card causes corruption, I had
it working ok when I only accessed 1 drive, which is kinda pointless...
:)J
Ryan Bourgeois wrote:
> Danny Cox wrote:
>
>> I've been mostly lurking here for awhile now, just seeing how things
>> are going. I've seen various drives on a blacklist, and various
>> controllers that do this or that well, but have problems doing foo.
>> There also seem to have been a Strange Interaction as well, but that's a
>> fuzzy memory at best.
>>
>> So, my question is: if YOU were to purchase an SATA setup brand new,
>> what would you specify? Which drives, motherboards, and PCI cards would
>> you recommend that just work?
>>
>> I don't even mean "work like a Mercedes", by which I mean almost
>> perfection. I mean like a Chevy. I don't mind a little tinkering to
>> get it right, but I want my disk subsystem to be solid thereafter! I've
>> got important stuff here! Like my wife's backup; NEVER lose your wife's
>> backup (shudder)!
>>
>> If SATA isn't ready for consumerdom, I'd like to know that too. This
>> just isn't for Jeff and Bart either. I'd like to hear success stories
>> from those whose systems just hum along all the time!
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>>
>>
> On my file server I run the Highpoint RocketRAID 1640. It's a software
> RAID five card. Basically it's just a PCI card with two HPT374 chips
> each with two SATA plugs (a total of four plugs). So it's a no frills
> PATA card with SATA converters onboard. I run three Western Digital
> 120gb SATA drives on it with a Linux Software RAID 5 array on them.
> Aside from the fact that it's a PATA card at heart (so it doesn't use
> libata), my only complaint is that it's slow. It's stable as a rock,
> though, I've had no problems with the card or drives.
>
> I have a Promise SX4 that I tried. I had those same three drives
> connected to it, but I was having some problems with the array when I
> was using it. It had a tendency to corrupt the filesystem, for some
> reason. I was having other problems at the time, though, so it could be
> unrelated to the card I was using. If I get time and money I may try
> and set up an array on the card for testing.
>
> Anyways, out of personal preference, I go with Western Digital hard
> drives. For SATA cards, the Promise TX cards seem pretty reliable. I
> have an onboard TX2 on my main machine running a WD Raptor. I've had
> absolutely no problems with it and libata. Or in Windows, for that matter.
>
> I haven't used any other cards or drives, so I cannot offer anything in
> that direction.
>
> -Ryan Bourgeois
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-18 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-16 4:28 libata oops 2.6.11-rc4 yesterdays BK Brad Campbell
2005-02-16 11:01 ` Brad Campbell
2005-02-16 17:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-16 20:54 ` Brad Campbell
2005-02-16 21:40 ` Andy Warner
2005-02-16 22:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-16 23:49 ` Andy Warner
2005-02-16 23:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-17 0:20 ` Andy Warner
2005-02-17 5:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-17 14:59 ` Andy Warner
2005-02-17 19:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-17 19:25 ` Andy Warner
2005-02-17 22:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-17 19:42 ` Which SATA Combos To Consider? Danny Cox
2005-02-17 20:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-18 0:25 ` Ryan Bourgeois
2005-02-18 0:44 ` Johny Ågotnes [this message]
2005-02-18 0:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-21 23:50 ` Johny Ågotnes
2005-02-21 23:50 ` Johny Ågotnes
2005-02-22 1:55 ` Johny Ågotnes
2005-02-18 6:13 ` libata oops 2.6.11-rc4 yesterdays BK Brad Campbell
2005-02-19 4:14 ` Brad Campbell
2005-02-21 4:27 ` Brad Campbell
2005-02-22 10:09 ` Brad Campbell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-21 9:25 Which SATA Combos To Consider? linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42153A89.2090909@agotnes.com \
--to=johny@agotnes.com \
--cc=Danny.Cox@ECWeb.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgb005@latech.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).