From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: 2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:32:52 -0500 Message-ID: <421A4574.1000604@pobox.com> References: <20050220155600.GD5049@vanheusden.com> <4218C692.9040106@tiscali.de> <20050220180550.GA18606@ime.usp.br> <200502211943.59887.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <421A2D8F.3050704@pobox.com> <20050221194227.GH6722@wiggy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:2695 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262089AbVBUUdc (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:33:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20050221194227.GH6722@wiggy.net> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Wichert Akkerman Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Matthias-Christian Ott , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rog=E9rio_Brito?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>You should add this to your procmailrc :) >> >># Nuke duplicate messages >>:0 Wh: msgid.lock >>| $FORMAIL -D 32768 msgid.cache > > > That has the nasty side-effect of spreading messages for a single > discussion amongst many different mailboxes depending on which path > happens to be the first to deliver an email to you. These are _duplicate_ messages. The To/CC doesn't vary in my experience. Therefore, sorting on To/CC always guarantees my messages go into the correct folder. Maybe you are thinking of reply-to-munged lists, which eliminate duplicates by eliminating custom To/CC lists. Jeff