From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: 2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:41:12 -0500 Message-ID: <421CF878.1080109@tmr.com> References: <421A2D8F.3050704@pobox.com><421A2D8F.3050704@pobox.com> <20050221194227.GH6722@wiggy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from prgy-npn1.prodigy.com ([207.115.54.37]:14807 "EHLO oddball.prodigy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261573AbVBWVgw (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:36:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20050221194227.GH6722@wiggy.net> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Wichert Akkerman Cc: Jeff Garzik , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Matthias-Christian Ott , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rog=E9rio_Brito?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>You should add this to your procmailrc :) >> >># Nuke duplicate messages >>:0 Wh: msgid.lock >>| $FORMAIL -D 32768 msgid.cache > > > That has the nasty side-effect of spreading messages for a single > discussion amongst many different mailboxes depending on which path > happens to be the first to deliver an email to you. It depends on how you process your mail, if you move to folders with determanent logic, checking various lists in order, then it always does the same thing. If you use the list header it could do what you suggest. I personally push a lot of the mailing lists to a news (usenet) server, since it allows a single copy of a message to be indexed in multiple groups, and some clients will skip what you have seen better than others. -- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me