From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joseph Harvell Subject: Re: corruption problem with 2.6.10 patch for Promise SATAII TX4 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:52:26 -0600 Message-ID: <4235A52A.6040704@dogpad.net> References: <422DBD7F.9030500@dogpad.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from dingo.dogpad.net ([65.70.180.33]:16770 "EHLO dingo.dogpad.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261520AbVCNOxy (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:53:54 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.dogpad.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E184C50E for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:52:27 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <422DBD7F.9030500@dogpad.net> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Jeff: Is your contribution to 2.6.11 based on Georg's patch? If so, I think there needs to be a warning in the promise_sata kernel config help at the very least. Have you considered porting the Promise driver to 2.6? I have been using that driver with 2.4.28 with no problems. Plus, it looks like they have support for native command queueing in the driver. However, I noticed what appears to be a significant amount of work being done in the interrupt handler. --- Joe Harvell