From: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
Doug Maxey <dwm@maxeymade.com>,
Linux IDE <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
bruss@alum.wpi.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH libata-dev-2.6 1/2] ata_dev_identify() check status fix
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:35:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42883F2C.4060403@tw.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4287D77F.4030306@pobox.com>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Could we not pass the Status value via struct ata_taskfile ?
>
>
Jeff,
I'm worried about:
1. struct ata_taskfile is part of struct ata_queued_cmd. The lifecycle of ata_queued_cmd is over
after __ata_qc_complete() is called. So, when wait_for_completion() returns,
qc has already been recycled for next use.
2. The following code is seen in ata_pio_error():
ata_qc_complete(qc, drv_stat | ATA_ERR);
It looks a good design of libata to me: ata_qc_complete() gets both qc and an additional status parameter.
The status paramerter is mixed of real hardware status and error found by the software.
Instead put the software error to qc->tf.status, maybe we could keep this good design and leave
struct ata_taskfile for the hardware only?
Albert
=====================
(The code in context.)
spin_lock_irqsave(&ap->host_set->lock, flags);
rc = ata_qc_issue(qc);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ap->host_set->lock, flags);
if (rc)
goto err_out;
else
wait_for_completion(&wait);
// When wait_for_completion() returns,
// the life cycle of qc was over and
// qc->tag == ATA_TAG_POISON; here.
// Maybe we should not access qc here.
status = qc->tf.status;
if (status & ATA_ERR) {
/*
* arg! EDD works for all test cases, but seems to return
* the ATA signature for some ATAPI devices. Until the
* reason for this is found and fixed, we fix up the mess
* here. If IDENTIFY DEVICE returns command aborted
* (as ATAPI devices do), then we issue an
* IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE.
*
* ATA software reset (SRST, the default) does not appear
* to have this problem.
*/
if ((using_edd) && (qc->tf.command == ATA_CMD_ID_ATA)) {
u8 err = ata_chk_err(ap);
if (err & ATA_ABORTED) {
dev->class = ATA_DEV_ATAPI;
//
// We should call ata_qc_new_init()
// to revive qc here?
//
qc->cursg = 0;
qc->cursg_ofs = 0;
qc->cursect = 0;
qc->nsect = 1;
goto retry;
}
}
goto err_out;
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-16 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-01 5:46 [PATCH libata-dev-2.6 1/2] ata_dev_identify() check status fix Albert Lee
2005-04-01 5:52 ` Brett Russ
2005-04-01 7:25 ` Albert Lee
2005-04-02 15:55 ` Albert Lee
2005-05-15 23:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-16 6:35 ` Albert Lee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42883F2C.4060403@tw.ibm.com \
--to=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=bruss@alum.wpi.edu \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=dwm@maxeymade.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).