From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Sil3112 bugfix: wich one??? Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 10:21:35 +0900 Message-ID: <4289471F.1050402@gmail.com> References: <200505041624.44269.kanniball@zmail.pt> <200505170043.28320.kanniball@zmail.pt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.198]:11190 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261275AbVEQBVl (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2005 21:21:41 -0400 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so589456rne for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 18:21:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200505170043.28320.kanniball@zmail.pt> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: kanniball@zmail.pt Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Kanniball wrote: > Nobody can answer me??? > Jeff, Tejun... > > On Wednesday 04 May 2005 16:24, Kanniball wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>There are two patches for fixing the problem with Silicon Image 311x SATA >>controllers, one from Silicon Image and other from Tejun Heo. >>Wich one "we" should apply? >> >>Thanks for your patience and for your work! >> >>Best regards, >> >>Paulo Fidalgo, aka Kanniball >> Hi, I think I've replied but I'm pretty delusional. :-) The two patches are independent. Just apply both. AFAIK, the patch from Silicon Image applies to only small number of equipments, and if you were using the controller okay except for low performance, sil patch wouldn't do much for you. But it can't hurt. Thanks. -- tejun