From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: device suspend/resume Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 03:10:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4292D37C.5020700@pobox.com> References: <20050523201535.GA24298@havoc.gtf.org> <1116880875.5021.34.camel@mulgrave> <20050523204516.GA28058@havoc.gtf.org> <1116886206.5021.42.camel@mulgrave> <20050524062128.GT9855@suse.de> <4292CF5D.90809@pobox.com> <20050524070714.GU9855@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050524070714.GU9855@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, May 24 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>I can describe how this will look when libata is divorced from SCSI, if >>you would like, too... > > I was beginning to dispair you had given up that plan... hehe, nope. I promised Linus, and I plan to keep my promise :) I know how to do it. Internally things have been kept as separate as possible from the SCSI layer. Bart even hinted at possibly using libata-without-SCSI for future /dev/hdX support. It's certainly doable. Jeff