From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: device suspend/resume Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 03:18:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4292D55B.3050801@pobox.com> References: <20050523201535.GA24298@havoc.gtf.org> <1116880875.5021.34.camel@mulgrave> <20050523204516.GA28058@havoc.gtf.org> <1116886206.5021.42.camel@mulgrave> <20050524062128.GT9855@suse.de> <4292CF5D.90809@pobox.com> <20050524070714.GU9855@suse.de> <4292D37C.5020700@pobox.com> <4292D44C.2040102@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4292D44C.2040102@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Jens Axboe , James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hannes Reinecke wrote: > We've finally succeeded in convincing everyone that having '/dev/sdX' > instead of '/dev/hdX' was a neccessary step forward. > I think we're getting shot if we now tell them to reverse this _again_. > Can we at least have it optional? I will not break compatibility with /dev/sdX, don't worry :) It will always be there as an optional piece, as I described in my other reply to you. Jeff