From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: device suspend/resume Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 12:37:38 -0400 Message-ID: <42935852.2020300@pobox.com> References: <20050523201535.GA24298@havoc.gtf.org> <1116880875.5021.34.camel@mulgrave> <20050523204516.GA28058@havoc.gtf.org> <1116886206.5021.42.camel@mulgrave> <20050524062128.GT9855@suse.de> <4292CF5D.90809@pobox.com> <20050524075953.GY9855@suse.de> <4292E3EE.10006@pobox.com> <20050524085133.GZ9855@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:7375 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262157AbVEXQhp (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 12:37:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050524085133.GZ9855@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > I agree, it's a cleaner approach, with the rq being a container for > generel messages as well not just SCSI commands. The one missing piece > for that was the rq->end_io() callback so everything doesn't have to go > down sync, but that is in now as well. > > I'll try and cook something up. Very cool ;) Jeff