From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: SATA speed. Should be 150 or 133? Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:50:17 -0400 Message-ID: <42C06689.5010107@rtr.ca> References: <42BB794B.6080109@rtr.ca> <42BC284E.7050202@rtr.ca> <42BE0B7D.4050307@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cpu1185.adsl.bellglobal.com ([207.236.110.166]:33036 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261772AbVF0UuV (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:50:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Oledzki Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: > >>> # hdparm -I /dev/sda >>> >>> /dev/sda: >>> (...) >>> DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6 .. > So, how this line would look like for SATA150? It wouldn't exist. No such concept. But we display it anyway, because most SATA drives are really PATA drives in disguise. -ml