From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGluIFBvdm9sbsO9?= Subject: Re: Promise TX4200 support? Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 06:36:46 +0200 Message-ID: <42DC835E.7030301@solnet.cz> References: <42DBFC9E.1040607@gentoo.org> <42DC0A99.2010304@solnet.cz> <42DC2F44.7000708@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from ns.solnet.cz ([193.165.198.50]:19138 "EHLO solnet.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261943AbVGSEhV (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:37:21 -0400 Received: from mail by solnet.cz with scanned-ok (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dujqz-0007xr-00 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 06:37:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <42DC2F44.7000708@gentoo.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Drake Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi Martin, >=20 > Martin Povoln=C3=BD wrote: >=20 >> We are succesfully running patched sata_promise with 3 disks in a >> raid5/raid1 setup. (Patched against ubuntu linux-image 2.6.11-1-686 >> package.) >=20 >=20 > Could you please either send in your patch, or tell me which board_ > setting (2037x/20319/20619) the device ID table should include so I c= an > write submit one myself. >=20 =46or me it works with 20319, but I don't understand the difference between different settings. *** sata_promise.c 2005-05-11 21:22:20.000000000 +0200 --- sata_promise_new.c 2005-05-11 21:22:02.000000000 +0200 *************** *** 164,171 **** --- 164,173 ---- { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3318, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, board_20319 }, { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3319, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, board_20319 }, + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3519, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, + board_20319 }, { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3d18, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, board_20319 }, { } /* terminate list */ Regards, --=20 Mgr. Martin Povoln=C3=BD, soLNet, s.r.o., +420777714458, martin.povolny@solnet.cz