From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Drake Subject: Re: Promise TX4200 support? Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:21:57 +0100 Message-ID: <42DCD445.6080102@gentoo.org> References: <42DBFC9E.1040607@gentoo.org> <42DC0A99.2010304@solnet.cz> <42DC2F44.7000708@gentoo.org> <42DC835E.7030301@solnet.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:46937 "EHLO mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261479AbVGSKVk (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2005 06:21:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <42DC835E.7030301@solnet.cz> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGluIFBvdm9sbsO9?= Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Povoln=C3=BD wrote: > For me it works with 20319, but I don't understand the difference > between different settings. 20319 is 4 port SATA. 2037x is 2 port SATA, optionally with 1 PATA port 20619 is 4 port PATA So I believe 20319 is the correct option. Jeff, the chip on the TX4200 is actually a PDC40519 but it meets the=20 description of the 20319. Is something like the patch below ok, or shou= ld we=20 add a new board_ entry? > *** sata_promise.c 2005-05-11 21:22:20.000000000 +0200 > --- sata_promise_new.c 2005-05-11 21:22:02.000000000 +0200 > *************** > *** 164,171 **** > --- 164,173 ---- > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3318, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, > board_20319 }, > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3319, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, > board_20319 }, > + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3519, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, > + board_20319 }, > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3d18, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, > board_20319 }, >=20 > { } /* terminate list */ Thanks, Daniel