From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Wilck Subject: Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 07:17:13 +0200 Message-ID: <42F05359.7030006@fujitsu-siemens.com> References: <42EF93F8.8050601@fujitsu-siemens.com> <20050802163519.GB3710@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from dgate1.fujitsu-siemens.com ([217.115.66.35]:17454 "EHLO dgate1.fujitsu-siemens.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262056AbVHCFRQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 01:17:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050802163519.GB3710@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, "Wichert, Gerhard" Jens Axboe wrote: >>If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is >>wrong in setting the SActive bit. > > I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my > original posts about this in the NCQ thread. Have you (or has anybody else) also seen the wrong behavior of the activity LED? Regards Martin -- Martin Wilck Phone: +49 5251 8 15113 Fujitsu Siemens Computers Fax: +49 5251 8 20409 Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1 mailto:Martin.Wilck@Fujitsu-Siemens.com D-33106 Paderborn http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/primergy