From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Tomt?= Subject: Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:08:40 +0200 Message-ID: <42F0A5B8.6060300@tomt.net> References: <42EF93F8.8050601@fujitsu-siemens.com> <20050802163519.GB3710@suse.de> <42F05359.7030006@fujitsu-siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail1.skjellin.no ([80.239.42.67]:27624 "EHLO mx1.skjellin.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262220AbVHCLIn (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 07:08:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <42F05359.7030006@fujitsu-siemens.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Wilck Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, "Wichert, Gerhard" Martin Wilck wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is >>> wrong in setting the SActive bit. >> >> >> I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my >> original posts about this in the NCQ thread. > > > Have you (or has anybody else) also seen the wrong behavior of the > activity LED? I have, Asus P5LD2 i945P, ICH7R AHCI controller, Hitachi Deskstar T7K250 250GB "SATA2" drives. Kernel 2.6.12.x