From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Schniedermeyer Subject: Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 21:21:23 +0200 Message-ID: <42F11933.7050607@citd.de> References: <42EF93F8.8050601@fujitsu-siemens.com> <20050802163519.GB3710@suse.de> <42F05359.7030006@fujitsu-siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from dsw2k3.info ([195.71.86.227]:16328 "EHLO dsw2k3.info") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262440AbVHCTVb (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:21:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <42F05359.7030006@fujitsu-siemens.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Martin Wilck wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is >>> wrong in setting the SActive bit. >> >> >> I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my >> original posts about this in the NCQ thread. > > Have you (or has anybody else) also seen the wrong behavior of the > activity LED? 925X-Chipset Lspci says: 8086:2652 Intel Corp. 82801FR/FRW (ICH6R/ICH6RW) SATA Controller (rev 03) HDD: Western Digital WD2000JD-00H, i believe this HDD is non-NCQ. Kernels: 2.6.10 - 2.6.12 The Activity-LED has burned like a light-bulb every since i have that computer. (Excluding the few seconds before booting Linux. :-) ) Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.