From: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
hare@suse.de
Subject: Re: libata total system lockup fix
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:16:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F8C8D0.2010603@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42F2E267.50402@gmail.com>
Tejun,
I'm back from holiday now, and will try your one-liner
in place of the more complex patch I had been using.
(that's what you intended, right?)
Should know within a few hours whether it solves this
problem here or not.
cheers
--
Mark Lord
Real-Time Remedies Inc.
mlord@pobox.com
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>
>> >The problem with this patch is that is causes leaks, and doesn't
>> actually ready the devices because scsi_eh_ready_devs() is never
>> called: scsi_eh_abort_cmds() is guaranteed to fail out every time its
>> called.
>>
>> MMmm.. bummer if that's the case, but it does execute here
>> on my machine about once every two seconds, continuously,
...
> Hello, Mark Lord.
>
> I think I've hit similar scsi-eh lockup problem during development of
> new EH/NCQ helpers. I currently don't remember where it exactly looped,
> but I recall that scmds jumped back and forth between two lists, one of
> which being eh_cmd_q which isn't cleared properly by SATA's strategy
> routine. Anyways, I'm attaching an one liner quick fix, which I'm not
> sure if it will work or not. Also, I'll post a combined patch of my new
> EH/NCQ helpers in a separate mail, which, hopefully, should be free of
> this issue.
>
> Please try out these two and let me know how they go. Here's the one
> liner against v2.6.12.
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ int ata_scsi_error(struct Scsi_Host *hos
> * appropriate place
> */
> host->host_failed--;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&host->eh_cmd_q);
>
> DPRINTK("EXIT\n");
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-09 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-25 13:47 libata total system lockup fix Mark Lord
2005-07-25 14:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-07-25 15:53 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-05 3:52 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-05 4:01 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-11 20:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-12 0:49 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 2:22 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-12 2:38 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 2:41 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-09 15:16 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2005-08-09 23:54 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-10 14:16 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-10 21:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-19 0:46 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-19 3:21 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-19 3:36 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-19 3:45 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-19 4:01 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-19 9:37 ` Erik Slagter
2005-08-19 9:35 ` Erik Slagter
2005-08-19 13:07 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-19 13:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-19 13:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-09-03 22:58 ` Mark Lord
2005-09-03 23:06 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42F8C8D0.2010603@pobox.com \
--to=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).