From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IDE: don't offer IDE_GENERIC on ia64
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:49:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42FBE3F8.1090006@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508111707.30861.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> You deduce this by the absence of SecO and PriO? I wonder if lspci
> should be enhanced to notice this, too. I assume that the IRQ 169
> doesn't correspond to anything in /proc/interrupts.
Correct.
> So the scenario in question (correct me if I'm wrong) is that we
> have a PCI IDE device that is handed off in compatibility mode (and
> may only work in that mode). In that case, the PCI *device* still
> exists, so shouldn't the IDE PCI code claim that device, notice that
> it's in compatibility mode, and use the legacy ports and IRQs if
> necessary?
>
> It seems like that all should work even if we don't have IDE_GENERIC.
Yes, you're right. Thinking more, the PCI IDE code should pick that up,
not the IDE_GENERIC code.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-11 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-11 20:24 [PATCH] IDE: don't offer IDE_GENERIC on ia64 Bjorn Helgaas
2005-08-11 20:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-08-11 20:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-08-12 19:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-08-16 10:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-16 14:05 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-11 20:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-11 20:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-08-11 20:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-11 21:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-08-11 21:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-11 21:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-11 23:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-08-11 23:49 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-08-12 8:35 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-12 10:33 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-08-11 23:01 ` Jack Steiner
2005-08-11 23:08 ` Jack Steiner
2005-08-12 8:40 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-15 21:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-08-16 9:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-16 9:54 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-16 12:55 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-16 12:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-16 13:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-08-16 13:49 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-16 19:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-08-16 20:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-16 20:25 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-16 20:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-16 21:48 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-11 21:58 Luck, Tony
2005-08-11 22:03 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42FBE3F8.1090006@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).