linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
Cc: Linux-ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SiI 3112A + Seagate HDs = still no go?
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:28:45 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42FC87ED.6030201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0FDE8D5B-CFF2-44F9-8C98-9C5EC5CDAE92@bootc.net>


  Hello, Chris.

Chris Boot wrote:
> 
> On 12 Aug 2005, at 4:24, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
>> Chris Boot wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I just recently took the plunge and bought 4 250 GB Seagate  drives  
>>> and a 2 port Silicon Image 3112A controller card for the 2  drives 
>>> my  motherboard doesn't handle. No matter how hard I try, I  can't 
>>> get the  hard drives to work: they are detected correctly  and work 
>>> reasonably  well under _very_ light load, but anything  like building 
>>> a RAID array  is a bit much and the whole controller  seems to lock up.
>>> I've tried adding the drive to the blacklist in the sata_sil.c  
>>> driver  and I still have the same trouble: as you can see the  
>>> messages below  relate to my patched kernel with the blacklist  fix. 
>>> I've seen that  this was discussed just yesterday, but that  seemed 
>>> to give nothing:  http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/ 
>>> kernel/0508.1/0310.html
>>> Ready and willing to hack my kernel to pieces; this machine is no  
>>> use  until I get all the drives working! Needless to say the  drives  
>>> connected to the on-board VIA controller work fine, as do  the 
>>> drives  currently on the SiI controller if I swap them around.
>>> Any ideas?
>>> TIA
>>> Chris
>>>
>>
>> [added linux-ide to cc list]
>>
>>  Can you please try w/ vanilla kernel (2.6.12 or 2.6.13-rc)?  And  w/ 
>> one drive only?
> 
> 
> I unplugged both drives from my on-board SATA controller and left  just 
> one connected to the 3112A controller. Rebooted with a fresh,  vanilla 
> 2.6.13-rc6 and ran:

  You can leave drives on on-board SATA controller.  It wouldn't make 
any difference.

> 
> dd if=/dev/zero of=test.img bs=1M count=16384
> 
> After about 30 seconds I got the crash and the kernel started  repeating 
> every 30 seconds (with different sector numbers):
> 
> ata1: command 0x35 timeout, stat 0xd9 host_stat 0x1
> ata1: status=0xd9 { Busy }
> SCSI error : <0 0 0 0> return code = 0x80000002
> sda: Current: sense key=0xb
> ASC=0x47 ASCQ=0x0
> end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 14937602
> ATA: abnormal status 0xD9 on port E0802087
> ATA: abnormal status 0xD9 on port E0802087
> ATA: abnormal status 0xD9 on port E0802087
> 
> dmesg:
> Linux version 2.6.13-rc6 (bootc@arcadia.bootc.net) (gcc version  
> 3.3.5-20050130 (Gentoo 3.3.5.20050130-r1, ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1,  
> pie-8.7.7.1)) #1 Fri Aug 12 12:31:25 BST 2005
> ...
> libata version 1.11 loaded.
> sata_sil version 0.9
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0a.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 177
> ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xE0802080 ctl 0xE080208A bmdma  0xE0802000 
> irq 177
> ata2: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xE08020C0 ctl 0xE08020CA bmdma  0xE0802008 
> irq 177
> ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:346b 83:7d01 84:4023 85:3469 86:3c01  87:4023 
> 88:207f
> ata1: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 488397168 sectors: lba48
> ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100
> scsi0 : sata_sil
> ata2: no device found (phy stat 00000000)
> scsi1 : sata_sil
>   Vendor: ATA       Model: ST3250823AS       Rev: 3.03
>   Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 05
> sata_via version 1.1
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0f.0[B] -> Link [ALKA] -> GSI 20 (level,  
> low) -> IRQ 169
> PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:0f.0, from 11 to 9
> sata_via(0000:00:0f.0): routed to hard irq line 9
> ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB400 ctl 0xB802 bmdma 0xC400 irq 169
> ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xBC00 ctl 0xC002 bmdma 0xC408 irq 169
> ata3: no device found (phy stat 00000000)
> scsi2 : sata_via
> ata4: no device found (phy stat 00000000)
> scsi3 : sata_via
> SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB)
> SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
> SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB)
> SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
> sda: sda1 sda2 sda3
> Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
> Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0,  type 0
> 
> I forgot to mention previously but I even tried with "noapic nolapic  
> acpi=off pci=routeirq" and got the same trouble.

  This is weird as ST3250823AS (and all Seagate .8 drives) are known to 
work without any problem with sii 3112/3114.  I currently don't own such 
a drive but someone confirmed me that ST3250823AS works w/ sii 3114 
without any problem (including bonnie++ results and all).  So, I don't 
think it's the good old mod15write problem.

  I hope it's just a bad hardware, cable or something like that; 
otherwise, you're hitting a new bug.  Can you verify if the drive works 
under windows?

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-12 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <12872CA9-F089-4955-8751-8CC4E7B2140A@bootc.net>
2005-08-12  3:24 ` SiI 3112A + Seagate HDs = still no go? Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 10:57   ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 11:28     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2005-08-12 11:33       ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 13:23         ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 14:08           ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 16:27             ` Chris Boot
     [not found]             ` <74C9A166-2FDC-45F8-BEB1-A574FD9602D4@bootc.net>
2005-08-13  1:13               ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-13 12:14                 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-13 14:59                   ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-17 10:32                     ` SiI 3112A + Seagate HDs = still no go? [SOLVED] Chris Boot
2005-08-12 15:19 ` SiI 3112A + Seagate HDs = still no go? Roger Heflin
2005-08-12 15:20   ` Chris Boot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42FC87ED.6030201@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=bootc@bootc.net \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).