From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Linux-ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SiI 3112A + Seagate HDs = still no go?
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:08:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42FCAD4D.7080707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <655E2636-B4D4-42EC-B10C-C8B8EFA09E33@bootc.net>
Chris Boot wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> On 12 Aug 2005, at 12:33, Chris Boot wrote:
>
>> Hi Tejun,
>>
>> On 12 Aug 2005, at 12:28, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Hello, Chris.
>>>
>>> Chris Boot wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 12 Aug 2005, at 4:24, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Chris Boot wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> I just recently took the plunge and bought 4 250 GB Seagate
>>>>>> drives and a 2 port Silicon Image 3112A controller card for the
>>>>>> 2 drives my motherboard doesn't handle. No matter how hard I
>>>>>> try, I can't get the hard drives to work: they are detected
>>>>>> correctly and work reasonably well under _very_ light load, but
>>>>>> anything like building a RAID array is a bit much and the whole
>>>>>> controller seems to lock up.
>>>>>> I've tried adding the drive to the blacklist in the sata_sil.c
>>>>>> driver and I still have the same trouble: as you can see the
>>>>>> messages below relate to my patched kernel with the blacklist
>>>>>> fix. I've seen that this was discussed just yesterday, but that
>>>>>> seemed to give nothing: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/ linux/
>>>>>> kernel/0508.1/0310.html
>>>>>> Ready and willing to hack my kernel to pieces; this machine is
>>>>>> no use until I get all the drives working! Needless to say the
>>>>>> drives connected to the on-board VIA controller work fine, as
>>>>>> do the drives currently on the SiI controller if I swap them
>>>>>> around.
>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>> TIA
>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [added linux-ide to cc list]
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please try w/ vanilla kernel (2.6.12 or 2.6.13-rc)? And
>>>>> w/ one drive only?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I unplugged both drives from my on-board SATA controller and left
>>>> just one connected to the 3112A controller. Rebooted with a fresh,
>>>> vanilla 2.6.13-rc6 and ran:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You can leave drives on on-board SATA controller. It wouldn't make
>>> any difference.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> dd if=/dev/zero of=test.img bs=1M count=16384
>>>> After about 30 seconds I got the crash and the kernel started
>>>> repeating every 30 seconds (with different sector numbers):
>>>> ata1: command 0x35 timeout, stat 0xd9 host_stat 0x1
>>>> ata1: status=0xd9 { Busy }
>>>> SCSI error : <0 0 0 0> return code = 0x80000002
>>>> sda: Current: sense key=0xb
>>>> ASC=0x47 ASCQ=0x0
>>>> end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 14937602
>>>> ATA: abnormal status 0xD9 on port E0802087
>>>> ATA: abnormal status 0xD9 on port E0802087
>>>> ATA: abnormal status 0xD9 on port E0802087
>>>> dmesg:
>>>> Linux version 2.6.13-rc6 (bootc@arcadia.bootc.net) (gcc version
>>>> 3.3.5-20050130 (Gentoo 3.3.5.20050130-r1, ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1,
>>>> pie-8.7.7.1)) #1 Fri Aug 12 12:31:25 BST 2005
>>>> ...
>>>> libata version 1.11 loaded.
>>>> sata_sil version 0.9
>>>> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0a.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 177
>>>> ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xE0802080 ctl 0xE080208A bmdma
>>>> 0xE0802000 irq 177
>>>> ata2: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xE08020C0 ctl 0xE08020CA bmdma
>>>> 0xE0802008 irq 177
>>>> ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:346b 83:7d01 84:4023 85:3469 86:3c01
>>>> 87:4023 88:207f
>>>> ata1: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 488397168 sectors: lba48
>>>> ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100
>>>> scsi0 : sata_sil
>>>> ata2: no device found (phy stat 00000000)
>>>> scsi1 : sata_sil
>>>> Vendor: ATA Model: ST3250823AS Rev: 3.03
>>>> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05
>>>> sata_via version 1.1
>>>> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0f.0[B] -> Link [ALKA] -> GSI 20
>>>> (level, low) -> IRQ 169
>>>> PCI: Via IRQ fixup for 0000:00:0f.0, from 11 to 9
>>>> sata_via(0000:00:0f.0): routed to hard irq line 9
>>>> ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB400 ctl 0xB802 bmdma 0xC400 irq 169
>>>> ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xBC00 ctl 0xC002 bmdma 0xC408 irq 169
>>>> ata3: no device found (phy stat 00000000)
>>>> scsi2 : sata_via
>>>> ata4: no device found (phy stat 00000000)
>>>> scsi3 : sata_via
>>>> SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB)
>>>> SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
>>>> SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB)
>>>> SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
>>>> sda: sda1 sda2 sda3
>>>> Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
>>>> Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0, type 0
>>>> I forgot to mention previously but I even tried with "noapic
>>>> nolapic acpi=off pci=routeirq" and got the same trouble.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is weird as ST3250823AS (and all Seagate .8 drives) are known
>>> to work without any problem with sii 3112/3114. I currently don't
>>> own such a drive but someone confirmed me that ST3250823AS works w/
>>> sii 3114 without any problem (including bonnie++ results and all).
>>> So, I don't think it's the good old mod15write problem.
>>>
>>> I hope it's just a bad hardware, cable or something like that;
>>> otherwise, you're hitting a new bug. Can you verify if the drive
>>> works under windows?
>>>
>>
>> Well, what piqued my interest is that the same drives work fine on my
>> on-board sata_via controller. All 4 drives were bought at the same
>> time and *seem* to be from the same batch, and all work fine on the
>> VIA controller and none work on the 3112A. I've also tried different
>> cables, all of which are Belkin which I thought were decent quality.
>>
>> I'll just try installing Winblows and let you know.
>
>
> I just installed Windows XP SP2 and Cygwin:
>
> $ dd if=/dev/zero of=test.img bs=1M count=4096
> 4096+0 records in
> 4096+0 records out
> 4294967296 bytes (4.3GB) copied, 166.27 seconds, 25.8 MB/s
>
> So it works a treat, although it's slower than maybe it should be:
> under linux and the VIA controller I get about 50 MB/sec, but that may
> just be down to the OS.
>
> Where do I start to debug the problem?
>
> Many thanks,
> Chris
>
[adding cc to Jeff Garzik. (Hi!)]
Hi again, Chris.
Unfortunately, I'm as lost as you are. Can you please do the followings?
* Verify if read is free from the problem. ie. does "dd if=/dev/sd?
of=/dev/null" work?
* Turn on ATA_DEBUG and ATA_VERBOSE_DEBUG in include/linux/libata.h
(change #undef's to #define's) and make the drive hang. The log should
show what was going on.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-12 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <12872CA9-F089-4955-8751-8CC4E7B2140A@bootc.net>
2005-08-12 3:24 ` SiI 3112A + Seagate HDs = still no go? Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 10:57 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 11:28 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 11:33 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 13:23 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 14:08 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2005-08-12 16:27 ` Chris Boot
[not found] ` <74C9A166-2FDC-45F8-BEB1-A574FD9602D4@bootc.net>
2005-08-13 1:13 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-13 12:14 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-13 14:59 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-17 10:32 ` SiI 3112A + Seagate HDs = still no go? [SOLVED] Chris Boot
2005-08-12 15:19 ` SiI 3112A + Seagate HDs = still no go? Roger Heflin
2005-08-12 15:20 ` Chris Boot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42FCAD4D.7080707@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=bootc@bootc.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).