From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: libata total system lockup fix Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:07:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4305D9A6.8010502@rtr.ca> References: <42E4ED70.1050501@pobox.com> <42E4FC75.70006@pobox.com> <42E50AE9.3000207@rtr.ca> <42F2E267.50402@gmail.com> <42FA70A9.6080608@pobox.com> <43052C03.7060306@pobox.com> <1124444101.2217.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cpu1185.adsl.bellglobal.com ([207.236.110.166]:10415 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932621AbVHSNHv (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:07:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1124444101.2217.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Erik Slagter Cc: Mark Lord , Jeff Garzik , Tejun Heo , IDE/ATA development list Erik Slagter wrote: > On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:46 -0400, Mark Lord wrote: > >>After a week of further experience with this patch, .. >>I'm now reverting to the original "broken" patch .. > > What is exactly the "broken" patch and what is "this" patch? "this" patch refered to the subject of that email, the "one-liner" included therein. The "broken" patch (which behaves in a very unbroken manner) is in the collection of "essentials" that I maintain for modern laptop users at http://rtr.ca/dell_i9300/kernels/ Cheers