linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Madore <Michael.Madore@aslab.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, albertcc@tw.ibm.com,
	Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6.13-rc3] Mod15Write quirk against v2.6.13
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:11:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4308DFF9.4080107@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4308DC5E.9020500@gmail.com>

Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
>  Hi, Jeff.
> 
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>
>>>  sata_sil Mod15Write workaround was broken by the following commit by
>>> Albert Lee.
>>>
>>> Commit: 21b1ed74ee3667dcabcba92e486988ea9119a085
>>> [PATCH] libata: Prevent the interrupt handler from completing a 
>>> command twice
>>>
>>>  This commit clears ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE in ata_qc_complete() and doesn't
>>> handle IRQ if ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE is cleared on entry to interrupt
>>> routine.  As m15w workaround executes single command multiple times,
>>> the flag is cleared after the first chunk completion and the following
>>> interrupt gets ignored resulting in "nobody cared" interrupt error.
>>>
>>>  The following changes are made in m15w workaround to fix this.
>>>
>>>  * Moved clearing of ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE before invoking ->complete_fn,
>>>    so that ->complete_fn can mangle with the flag.  This doesn't affect
>>>    any users.
>>>  * Added setting ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE in m15w chunk completion function.
>>
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
>>> @@ -3087,8 +3087,8 @@ void ata_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_c
>>>          ata_sg_clean(qc);
>>>  
>>>      /* call completion callback */
>>> -    rc = qc->complete_fn(qc, drv_stat);
>>>      qc->flags &= ~ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE;
>>> +    rc = qc->complete_fn(qc, drv_stat);
>>>  
>>>      /* if callback indicates not to complete command (non-zero),
>>>       * return immediately
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm leaning towards applying latest Albert's ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE fix, 
>> which does the same thing your patch did.
>>
>> For various complex tasks in the SCSI translation layer (SAT), we may 
>> wish to issue multiple ATA commands, before signalling completion.  As 
>> your mod15write patch is an example of this, it helps point out what 
>> parts of libata need work in order to accomplish this.
>>
>> Any comments before I apply Albert's patch?
>>
> 
>  I think the following patch I've posted deal with the same problem.
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ide&m=112454734102242&w=2


In the SCSI translation layer (SAT), some simulation may require issuing 
multiple ATA commands, before indicating a completion to the upper 
layers.  That capability is something I definitely want libata to 
support.  Your mod15write patch is an excellent example of this, even 
though I NAK'd it due to long term sata_sil maintenance burden.

That's why I think move ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE -anyway- may be a good idea.

	Jeff



      reply	other threads:[~2005-08-21 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1121894035.4885.15.camel@drevil.aslab.com>
2005-07-28 14:12 ` [PATCH linux-2.6.13-rc3] Mod15Write quirk against v2.6.13 Tejun Heo
2005-08-21 19:19   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-21 20:45     ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-21 21:10       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-21 21:44         ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-22 10:19           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-22 11:46             ` [PATCH libata:upstream] sil: apply M15W quirk selectively Tejun Heo
2005-08-22 19:36               ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-22 21:39                 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-22 21:45                   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-22 22:27                   ` [PATCH libata:upstream] sil: apply M15W quirk selectively (take 2) Tejun Heo
2005-08-23  5:06                     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-21 19:34   ` [PATCH linux-2.6.13-rc3] Mod15Write quirk against v2.6.13 Jeff Garzik
2005-08-21 19:56     ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-21 20:11       ` Jeff Garzik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4308DFF9.4080107@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=Michael.Madore@aslab.com \
    --cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
    --cc=dougg@torque.net \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).