From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: albertcc@tw.ibm.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH libata:upstream] fix atapi_packet_task vs. intr race
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:15:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43095156.7080500@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050822035956.GB28721@htj.dyndns.org>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Interrupts from devices sharing the same IRQ could cause
> ata_host_intr to finish commands being processed by atapi_packet_task
> if the commands are using ATA_PROT_ATAPI_NODATA or ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA
> protocol. This is because libata interrupt handler is unaware that
> interrupts are not expected during that period. This patch adds
> ATA_FLAG_NOINTR flag to tell the interrupt handler that we're not
> expecting interrupts.
>
> Note that once proper HSM is implemented for interrupt-driven PIO,
> this should be merged into it and this flag will be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Looks good except for two things:
* use spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore(), not spin_lock_irq()
* need to audit every driver[1]. if it implements its own
->irq_handler() hook, then you likely need to update the driver.
Jeff
[1] drivers/scsi/ahci.c drivers/scsi/ata_*.c drivers/scsi/sata_*.[ch]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-22 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-20 9:17 [PATCH libata-dev-2.6:upstream 00/02] atapi: packet task vs. intr race fix Tejun Heo
2005-08-20 9:17 ` [PATCH libata-dev-2.6:upstream 01/02] atapi: update ata_irq_on Tejun Heo
2005-08-20 9:17 ` [PATCH libata-dev-2.6:upstream 02/02] atapi: fix atapi_packet_task vs. ata_host_intr race Tejun Heo
2005-08-21 19:47 ` [PATCH libata-dev-2.6:upstream 00/02] atapi: packet task vs. intr race fix Jeff Garzik
2005-08-21 20:17 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-21 20:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-21 20:40 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-21 21:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-21 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-21 21:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-21 23:51 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-22 0:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-22 3:57 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-22 4:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-22 3:59 ` [PATCH libata:upstream] fix atapi_packet_task vs. intr race Tejun Heo
2005-08-22 4:15 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-08-22 5:59 ` [PATCH libata:upstream] fix atapi_packet_task vs. intr race (take 2) Tejun Heo
2005-08-22 6:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-22 7:06 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-23 5:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-21 20:25 ` [PATCH libata-dev-2.6:upstream 00/02] atapi: packet task vs. intr race fix Jeff Garzik
2005-08-22 14:48 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43095156.7080500@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).