linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Doug Maxey <dwm@maxeymade.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] libata new EH document
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:26:41 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43143461.7040606@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43142279.3070004@tw.ibm.com>

Albert Lee wrote:
>>
>> 4. Corresponding scmd's result code is set to
>>    SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION and qc->scsidone() callback is called
>>    directly.  As we haven't filled sense data,
>>    scsi_determine_disposition() will return FAILED and SCSI EH will
>>    be scheduled.  Note that as we directly call qc->scsidone(), qc is
>>    left intact.
>>  
>>
> 
> Could we get the sense data before calling qc->scsidone()?  (Using the 
> proposed separate
> EH qc can keep the original qc intact.)
> 
> The issue:
> When a DVD drive returns MEDIUM_ERROR in the sense data, libata doesn't 
> retry the command.
> 
> For libata, when scsi_softirq() calls scsi_decide_disposition() and 
> scsi_check_sense() to determine
> how to handle the result, scsi_check_sense() always returns "fail" since 
> the sense data is not there
> yet. The sense data is requested later in the libata error handler. But 
> the command has already been
> considered as an "error".
> 
> By having the sense data ready before calling qc->scsidone(), we can 
> make the
> NEEDS_RETRY work in scsi_softirq().  So, for things like MEDIUM_ERROR, 
> the device has
> a chance to retry/recover the error. This seems to be important for 
> devices with built-in
> defect management system.

  There are two ways a scmd can leave EH - retry by scsi_queue_insert() 
and finish by scsi_finish_cmd().  I think the problem you described can 
be easily solved by choosing the former method when finishing the qc 
from EH.  Note that other advanced EH stuff like reconfiguring transport 
speed also requires retrying, so we will surely have a mechanism for 
retrying failed qc's from EH.

  Wouldn't that be enough?

  Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-30 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-29  6:11 [RFC] libata new EH document Tejun Heo
2005-08-29  6:13 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-30  9:10 ` Albert Lee
2005-08-30 10:26   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2005-08-30 14:32     ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01  1:17       ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-01  2:22         ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-01  2:42           ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-01  3:33           ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01  3:30         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01  3:44           ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-01  4:38             ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01  5:44               ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-01  5:54                 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-01 13:24                   ` James Bottomley
2005-09-01 21:40                     ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01 21:46                       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-01 22:09                         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01 22:27                           ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-01 23:17                             ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-02  7:09                             ` Stefan Richter
2005-09-01 22:22                         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01 22:31                           ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-01 21:55                       ` James Bottomley
2005-09-01 22:07                         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01 22:23                           ` James Bottomley
2005-09-01 22:36                             ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01 23:01                               ` James Bottomley
2005-09-01 23:03                                 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01 23:27                                 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-01  2:22     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-30 14:27   ` James Bottomley
2005-09-07  8:25 ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43143461.7040606@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwm@maxeymade.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).