From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: Re: [RFC] libata new EH document Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 18:22:59 -0400 Message-ID: <43177F43.3000402@adaptec.com> References: <20050901043850.15186.qmail@web51611.mail.yahoo.com> <43169520.6040008@gmail.com> <20050901055421.GA23496@havoc.gtf.org> <1125581097.4834.5.camel@mulgrave> <4317755C.5080700@adaptec.com> <431776A0.2030107@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from magic.adaptec.com ([216.52.22.17]:40594 "EHLO magic.adaptec.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030460AbVIAWXF (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:23:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <431776A0.2030107@pobox.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: James Bottomley , Tejun Heo , ltuikov@yahoo.com, Albert Lee , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, SCSI Mailing List , Doug Maxey On 09/01/05 17:46, Jeff Garzik wrote: > This is the same reason a couple RAID drivers use the SCSI layer. It > has nothing to do with SCSI-as-defined-by-T10, and more to do with the Do you think T10 has anything to offer Linux SCSI Core? Luben > fact that SCSI provides a robust queueing/EH/block interface infrastructure.