From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] libata new EH document
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 18:31:46 -0400
Message-ID: <43178152.4080105@pobox.com>
References: <20050901043850.15186.qmail@web51611.mail.yahoo.com>	 <43169520.6040008@gmail.com>  <20050901055421.GA23496@havoc.gtf.org> <1125581097.4834.5.camel@mulgrave> <4317755C.5080700@adaptec.com> <431776A0.2030107@pobox.com> <43177F43.3000402@adaptec.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:30933 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030484AbVIAWbw (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:31:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <43177F43.3000402@adaptec.com>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, ltuikov@yahoo.com, Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, Doug Maxey <dwm@maxeymade.com>

Luben Tuikov wrote:
> On 09/01/05 17:46, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>>This is the same reason a couple RAID drivers use the SCSI layer.  It 
>>has nothing to do with SCSI-as-defined-by-T10, and more to do with the 
> 
> 
> Do you think T10 has anything to offer Linux SCSI Core?

I was attempting to differentiate between SCSI, the protocol, and SCSI, 
the Linux implementation.

I have no idea how to answer your question.  We give feedback to T10 all 
the time.

	Jeff