From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge? Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:18:20 -0400 Message-ID: <433527EC.8050503@pobox.com> References: <433104E0.4090308@triplehelix.org> <433221A1.5000600@pobox.com> <20050922103605.GA1527@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:24766 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932155AbVIXKSi (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:18:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050922103605.GA1527@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Joshua Kwan , axboe@suse.de, Linux Kernel , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton Pavel Machek wrote: > I think that shared buses are rare enough to be safely ignored. Hardly. This potentially covers many enterprise installations that use fibre channel, iSCSI, plus the upcoming SAS device networks. Desktop != the entire universe. > We could simply say "never ever suspend machine with some > disks on shared bus". This is indeed a fair statement, at least in the short term. Jeff