From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
Linux IDE <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Doug Maxey <dwm@maxeymade.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>, Brett Russ <russb@emc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/4] irq-pio: add read/write multiple support
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 06:19:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4342574C.50900@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43412FF6.5030006@tw.ibm.com>
Albert Lee wrote:
> Patch 4/4: add read/write multiple support
>
> Changes:
> - add ATA_CMD_READ_MULTI, etc. to ata.h
> - add multi_count to ata_device and initialize it with device
> identify data
> - merge ata_prot_to_cmd() with ata_dev_set_protocol()
> - ata_pio_complete(): change the wait condition from (ATA_BUSY |
> ATA_DRQ) to ATA_BUSY
> - add ata_pio_sectors() to support r/w multiple commands
> - ata_pio_block(): add ata_altstatus(ap) to prevent reading device
> status before it is valid
>
>
> For your review, thanks.
>
> Albert
> Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --- id7/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-10-03 12:39:03.000000000 +0800
> +++ id8/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-10-03 18:33:26.000000000 +0800
> @@ -616,49 +616,6 @@ void ata_tf_from_fis(u8 *fis, struct ata
> }
>
> /**
> - * ata_prot_to_cmd - determine which read/write opcodes to use
> - * @protocol: ATA_PROT_xxx taskfile protocol
> - * @lba48: true is lba48 is present
> - *
> - * Given necessary input, determine which read/write commands
> - * to use to transfer data.
> - *
> - * LOCKING:
> - * None.
> - */
> -static int ata_prot_to_cmd(int protocol, int lba48)
> -{
> - int rcmd = 0, wcmd = 0;
> -
> - switch (protocol) {
> - case ATA_PROT_PIO:
> - if (lba48) {
> - rcmd = ATA_CMD_PIO_READ_EXT;
> - wcmd = ATA_CMD_PIO_WRITE_EXT;
> - } else {
> - rcmd = ATA_CMD_PIO_READ;
> - wcmd = ATA_CMD_PIO_WRITE;
> - }
> - break;
> -
> - case ATA_PROT_DMA:
> - if (lba48) {
> - rcmd = ATA_CMD_READ_EXT;
> - wcmd = ATA_CMD_WRITE_EXT;
> - } else {
> - rcmd = ATA_CMD_READ;
> - wcmd = ATA_CMD_WRITE;
> - }
> - break;
> -
> - default:
> - return -1;
> - }
> -
> - return rcmd | (wcmd << 8);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> * ata_dev_set_protocol - set taskfile protocol and r/w commands
> * @dev: device to examine and configure
> *
> @@ -675,19 +632,42 @@ static void ata_dev_set_protocol(struct
> {
> int pio = (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_PIO);
> int lba48 = (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_LBA48);
> - int proto, cmd;
> + int rcmd, wcmd;
>
> - if (pio)
> - proto = dev->xfer_protocol = ATA_PROT_PIO;
> - else
> - proto = dev->xfer_protocol = ATA_PROT_DMA;
> + if (pio) {
> + dev->xfer_protocol = ATA_PROT_PIO;
>
> - cmd = ata_prot_to_cmd(proto, lba48);
> - if (cmd < 0)
> - BUG();
> + if (dev->multi_count) {
> + if (lba48) {
> + rcmd = ATA_CMD_READ_MULTI_EXT;
> + wcmd = ATA_CMD_WRITE_MULTI_EXT;
> + } else {
> + rcmd = ATA_CMD_READ_MULTI;
> + wcmd = ATA_CMD_WRITE_MULTI;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (lba48) {
> + rcmd = ATA_CMD_PIO_READ_EXT;
> + wcmd = ATA_CMD_PIO_WRITE_EXT;
> + } else {
> + rcmd = ATA_CMD_PIO_READ;
> + wcmd = ATA_CMD_PIO_WRITE;
> + }
> + }
> + } else {
> + dev->xfer_protocol = ATA_PROT_DMA;
> +
> + if (lba48) {
> + rcmd = ATA_CMD_READ_EXT;
> + wcmd = ATA_CMD_WRITE_EXT;
> + } else {
> + rcmd = ATA_CMD_READ;
> + wcmd = ATA_CMD_WRITE;
> + }
> + }
>
> - dev->read_cmd = cmd & 0xff;
> - dev->write_cmd = (cmd >> 8) & 0xff;
> + dev->read_cmd = rcmd;
> + dev->write_cmd = wcmd;
> }
>
> static const char * xfer_mode_str[] = {
I rather liked having ata_prot_to_cmd() separate, but your version is
OK. No objection, just a twitch :)
> @@ -2483,13 +2469,13 @@ static int ata_pio_complete (struct ata_
> * we enter, BSY will be cleared in a chk-status or two. If not,
> * the drive is probably seeking or something. Snooze for a couple
> * msecs, then chk-status again. If still busy, fall back to
> - * HSM_ST_POLL state.
> + * HSM_ST_LAST_POLL state.
> */
> - drv_stat = ata_busy_wait(ap, ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRQ, 10);
> - if (drv_stat & (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRQ)) {
> + drv_stat = ata_busy_wait(ap, ATA_BUSY, 10);
> + if (drv_stat & ATA_BUSY) {
> msleep(2);
> - drv_stat = ata_busy_wait(ap, ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRQ, 10);
> - if (drv_stat & (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRQ)) {
> + drv_stat = ata_busy_wait(ap, ATA_BUSY, 10);
> + if (drv_stat & ATA_BUSY) {
> ap->hsm_task_state = HSM_ST_LAST_POLL;
> ap->pio_task_timeout = jiffies + ATA_TMOUT_PIO;
> return 1;
Eventually we should make sure that DRQ is cleared, at the end of the
transfer. Does other code make this check?
Ideally, in _all_ cases where look at the status register, we should
check the DRDY and DF bits as well. That's why in drivers/ide/ you find
check_bits = ATA_BSY | ATA_DRQ | ATA_DF | ATA_DRDY
ok_bits = ATA_DRDY
if ((Status & check_bits) == ok_bits) # BUS IDLE
OK
else
error
Patch is otherwise OK.
Not applied, since patches #2 and #3 were not applied.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-04 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-09 16:14 [PATCH RFC] libata: interrupt driven pio Albert Lee
2005-09-09 17:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-09 18:14 ` Doug Maxey
2005-09-22 4:00 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/3] libata: interrupt driven pio (revised) Albert Lee
2005-09-22 4:09 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/3] libata: interrupt driven pio for libata-core Albert Lee
2005-09-23 9:25 ` Albert Lee
2005-09-22 4:11 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/3] libata: rename task states/variables Albert Lee
2005-09-23 9:34 ` Albert Lee
2005-09-22 4:14 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/3] libata: interrupt driven pio for LLD Albert Lee
2005-09-22 12:56 ` Mark Lord
2005-09-23 2:40 ` Albert Lee
2005-09-23 9:46 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/3] libata: interrupt driven pio (revised) Jeff Garzik
2005-09-27 9:31 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/4] libata: interrupt driven pio (revised 2) Albert Lee
2005-09-27 9:34 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/4] libata: indent and whitespace change Albert Lee
2005-09-27 9:36 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/4] libata: rename host states Albert Lee
2005-09-28 15:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-27 9:38 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/4] libata: interrupt driven pio for libata-core Albert Lee
2005-09-28 16:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-29 10:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-09-30 8:02 ` Albert Lee
2005-09-30 9:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-09-30 11:28 ` Albert Lee
2005-09-30 12:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-09-30 11:04 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/4] libata: irq driven pio follow-up patches Albert Lee
2005-09-30 11:07 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/4] irq-pio: add comments and cleanup Albert Lee
2005-09-30 11:09 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/4] irq-pio: rename atapi_packet_task() and comments Albert Lee
2005-09-30 11:11 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/4] irq-pio: simplify if condition in ata_dataout_task() Albert Lee
2005-09-30 11:14 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4] irq-pio: cleanup ata_qc_issue_prot() Albert Lee
2005-09-30 11:21 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/4] libata: irq driven pio follow-up patches Jeff Garzik
2005-10-03 11:46 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/4] libata: more " Albert Lee
2005-10-03 13:00 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/4] irq-pio: move functions Albert Lee
2005-10-03 13:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/4] irq-pio: remove ap->dataout_task Albert Lee
2005-10-04 10:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-04 11:54 ` Albert Lee
2005-10-03 13:18 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/4] irq-pio: integrate ata_pio_first_block() with ata_pio_task() Albert Lee
2005-10-04 10:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-03 13:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4] irq-pio: add read/write multiple support Albert Lee
2005-10-03 13:35 ` Mark Lord
2005-10-04 9:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-04 12:00 ` Albert Lee
2005-10-04 12:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-04 12:22 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/4] libata: CHS follow-up patches Albert Lee
2005-10-04 12:27 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/4] CHS: white space beautification Albert Lee
2005-10-04 12:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-04 12:29 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/4] CHS: tidy up SCSI lba and transfer length calculation Albert Lee
2005-10-04 12:30 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/4] CHS: add CHS support to ata_scsi_start_stop_xlat() Albert Lee
2005-10-04 12:34 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4] CHS: calculate LBA28/LBA48 commands and protocol on the fly Albert Lee
2005-10-04 12:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-05 11:16 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/4] libata: more CHS follow-up patches Albert Lee
2005-10-05 11:20 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/4] CHS: move the initialization of taskfile LBA flags Albert Lee
2005-10-05 11:23 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/4] CHS: calculate read/write commands and protocol on the fly Albert Lee
2005-10-05 11:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/4] CHS: support overriding the ata_rwcmd_protocol() function Albert Lee
2005-10-05 11:27 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4] CHS: optimize LBA28/LBA48 usage Albert Lee
2005-10-05 11:59 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/4] CHS: move the initialization of taskfile LBA flags (resend) Albert Lee
2005-10-05 12:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/4] CHS: calculate read/write commands and protocol on the fly (resend) Albert Lee
2005-10-05 12:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/4] CHS: support overriding the ata_rwcmd_protocol() function (resend) Albert Lee
2005-10-05 12:04 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4] CHS: optimize LBA28/LBA48 usage (resend) Albert Lee
2005-10-06 11:26 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/4] libata: more CHS follow-up patches Jeff Garzik
2005-10-07 6:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] libata: CHS follow-up patches (resend #2) Albert Lee
2005-10-07 6:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] CHS: move the initialization of taskfile LBA flags Albert Lee
2005-10-07 7:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] CHS: calculate read/write commands and protocol on the fly Albert Lee
2005-10-07 7:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] CHS: LBA28/LBA48 optimization Albert Lee
2005-10-07 8:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] libata: CHS follow-up patches (resend #4) Albert Lee
2005-10-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] CHS: move the initialization of taskfile LBA flags " Albert Lee
2005-10-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] CHS: calculate read/write commands and protocol on the fly " Albert Lee
2005-10-07 8:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] CHS: LBA28/LBA48 optimization " Albert Lee
2005-10-09 13:41 ` [PATCH 0/3] libata: CHS follow-up patches " Jeff Garzik
2005-10-11 11:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] libata: CHS follow-up patches (resend #5) Albert Lee
2005-10-11 11:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] CHS: move the initialization of taskfile LBA flags " Albert Lee
2005-10-11 11:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] CHS: calculate read/write commands and protocol on the fly " Albert Lee
2005-10-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] CHS: LBA28/LBA48 optimization " Albert Lee
2005-10-11 13:09 ` Mark Lord
2005-10-11 13:12 ` Mark Lord
2005-10-12 5:05 ` Albert Lee
2005-10-04 15:48 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4] CHS: calculate LBA28/LBA48 commands and protocol on the fly Alan Cox
2005-10-04 10:19 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-09-27 9:39 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4] libata: interrupt driven pio for LLD Albert Lee
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-01 11:12 [PATCH/RFC 0/4] libata: more irq driven pio follow-up patches Albert Lee
2005-11-01 11:33 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4] irq-pio: add read/write multiple support Albert Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4342574C.50900@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=dwm@maxeymade.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=russb@emc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).