From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Drake Subject: Re: [PATCH] via82cxxx IDE: Support multiple controllers Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:38:25 +0100 Message-ID: <434D2DF1.9070709@gentoo.org> References: <43146CC3.4010005@gentoo.org> <58cb370e05083008121f2eb783@mail.gmail.com> <43179CC9.8090608@gentoo.org> <58cb370e050927062049be32f8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:31427 "EHLO mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964804AbVJLPi1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:38:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <58cb370e050927062049be32f8@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, posting@blx4.net, vsu@altlinux.ru Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > I would prefer /proc/via > to vanish because it complicates driver needlessly (could you do > this in separate patch?). I'm working on a user-space app to provide the same info. It's nearly there but lacking some timing info. Do you have any suggestions for how I can compute the value of via_clock in userspace? (i.e. some equivalent of system_bus_clock()) Thanks, Daniel