From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Drake Subject: Re: [PATCH] via82cxxx IDE: Remove /proc/via entry Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:52:36 +0100 Message-ID: <434EE534.6010500@gentoo.org> References: <43146CC3.4010005@gentoo.org> <58cb370e05083008121f2eb783@mail.gmail.com> <43179CC9.8090608@gentoo.org> <58cb370e050927062049be32f8@mail.gmail.com> <433B16BD.7040409@gentoo.org> <58cb370e0509290027404f5224@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Grzegorz Kulewski Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, posting@blx4.net, vsu@altlinux.ru List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hi, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote: >>> As a user of this controller, I think that if it is not then this patch >>> should be changed to export it or should be dropped. The data from that >>> file is really helpfull in debugging problems (for example related to >>> bad >>> cables or breaking disks/cdroms). Per Bart's suggestion, I've created a user-space app which shows identical data (and doesn't even rely on the via82cxxx IDE driver). http://www.reactivated.net/software/viaideinfo/ So, I think we should be clear to drop /proc/ide/via now. Daniel