From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Douglas Gilbert Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] libata: scsi error handling, encore Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:30:59 +1000 Message-ID: <435069E3.90306@torque.net> References: <43490BC8.9060504@torque.net> <434919E4.1080601@pobox.com> Reply-To: dougg@torque.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <434919E4.1080601@pobox.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, htejun@gmail.com, russb@emc.com List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > Douglas Gilbert wrote: > >> This is a series of patches that are equivalent to >> one sent on 2005/09/19: >> "[PATCH] libata: scsi error handling, lk 2.6.14-rc1" >> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112711945709949&w=2 >> >> The aim is to build more general sense buffers for SCSI >> errors detected in the SCSI ATA translation layer in libata. >> These patches are against Jeff's libata-dev git repository, >> upstream branch. >> Patch 1: adds ata_scsi_set_sense() extern declaration and >> definition >> Patch 2: switch error processing in libata-scsi.c to use >> ata_scsi_set_sense() >> Patch 3: remove static inline definitions in libata.h that >> are no longer used after patch 2 >> >> Signed-off-by: Douglas Gilbert > > > First and foremost, applied all three patches. Thanks for your > patience. 'upstream' branch will reflect your changes as soon as > master.kernel.org propagates to the public mirrors. Jeff, Six days have passed and "git pull ..../libata-dev" still does not reflect these changes. Am I doing something wrong? Should I wait before submitting more changes? Doug Gilbert