From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15-rc1] libata: fix passthru for slave devices Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:37:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4376C31B.1010507@rtr.ca> References: <4375CA38.9000905@superbug.demon.co.uk> <437607B5.7060605@rtr.ca> <43762CEF.2070704@pobox.com> <43764853.5050306@rtr.ca> <43764904.5030309@rtr.ca> <4376788E.9010503@pobox.com> <437680BA.40707@rtr.ca> <437685A5.3020804@pobox.com> <4376A9DB.9080107@rtr.ca> <4376B119.6030303@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cpu1185.adsl.bellglobal.com ([207.236.110.166]:17089 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751342AbVKMEht (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:37:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4376B119.6030303@pobox.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: James Courtier-Dutton , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > Mark Lord wrote: > >> No. Those parens are needed, to help gcc distinguish between >> a common programming error and intentional use of "&" rather than "&&". > > How is this different from any other 'flags' test in libata? ACK. Go for it. Cheers