From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:41:52 -0500 Message-ID: <439A4070.2000500@pobox.com> References: <20051208145257.GB21946@srcf.ucam.org> <20051208171901.GA22451@srcf.ucam.org> <20051209114246.GB16945@infradead.org> <20051209114944.GA1068@havoc.gtf.org> <20051209115235.GB25771@srcf.ucam.org> <43997171.9060105@pobox.com> <20051209121124.GA25974@srcf.ucam.org> <439975AB.5000902@pobox.com> <20051209122457.GB26070@srcf.ucam.org> <439A23E8.3080407@pobox.com> <20051210023426.GA31220@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20051210023426.GA31220@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Alan Cox , randy_d_dunlap@linux.intel.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Matthew Garrett wrote: > ACPI allows us to detect hotplug on ICH5, which sounds like a good > argument for its inclusion. Do you even know if this special case is applicable outside of Dell ICH5 boxes? And I thought your previous messages were referring to ICH6? This is sounding more and more like a special-case-of-a-special-case. Jeff