From: Terrence Martin <tmartin@physics.ucsd.edu>
To: Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Interesting Performance with Marvell
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:33:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43AA3AB3.404@physics.ucsd.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1EpH5b-0001UY-D5@highlab.com>
Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>Terrence Martin <tmartin@physics.ucsd.edu> wrote:
>
>
>>Sebastian what are the mfg of the Marvell controller you are using?
>>
>>
>
>Sonnet. It's their "Tempo-X 8 SATA" card. PCI-X, 8 external SATA
>ports and no internal ports. I'll post performance numbers soon or
>after Newtonmas.
>
>Who made you 8-port card?
>
>
>
>
Supermicro is the manufacturer of the board. As far as I can tell it is
just a PCI-X SATA controller with the Marvell chipset driving 8
interfaces. I am evaluating various SATA controllers, raid and non-raid
to see if any actually can provide decent performance. So far 3ware
9550SX is ok, the Areca 1110 is not that impressive using their driver
at least. The Marvell 8 port addin card is comparable to the onboard
Marvell 4 port for reads delivering 190MB/s but it is much slower on
writes for some reason.
I know that drivers can make a significant difference. With 3ware 9500
4LP cards the 3ware driver provides about twice the performance of the
one that comes with redhats RHEL4.2 kernels. I have not tried kernel.org
kernels on that card. 9550SX is a 3ware provided driver.
I just see a lot of variance between cards and cost seldom seems to
indicate performance. The supermicro card is about $125US so is good
value if I can figure out why the poor write performance compared to the
onboard. The onboard I am happy with so far. My opterons have the
marvell onboard as well, 4 port. I will be checking those next.
Terrence
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-22 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-22 0:59 Interesting Performance with Marvell Terrence Martin
2005-12-22 3:25 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2005-12-22 5:33 ` Terrence Martin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43AA3AB3.404@physics.ucsd.edu \
--to=tmartin@physics.ucsd.edu \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seb@highlab.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).