From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [git patches] 2.6.x libata updates Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:43:48 -0500 Message-ID: <43BAB7D4.4050204@pobox.com> References: <20060103164319.GA402@havoc.gtf.org> <58cb370e0601030851w62fc917bibe0fd5069b2f3e44@mail.gmail.com> <1136309555.22598.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:64656 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932385AbWACRoE (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:44:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1136309555.22598.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > On Maw, 2006-01-03 at 17:51 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >>>+ * with SITRE and the 0x44 timing register). See pata_oldpiix and pata_mpiix >>>+ * for the early chip drivers. >> >>pata_oldpiix and pata_mpiix are not in the mainline > > > They are probably ready for mainline and since Linux currently has no > support for either it might be nice to get them in. Anything specific > they need polishing for Jeff ? Not really. If there's no support in mainline, I'm ok with pushing them upstream... provided that they have been tested and verified to work on at least one machine? :) Jeff