From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] libata: create pio/atapi task queueing wrappers Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:02:54 -0500 Message-ID: <43D99B6E.1090502@pobox.com> References: <11379893773912-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:14522 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751033AbWA0EC5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:02:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <11379893773912-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, albertcc@tw.ibm.com Tejun Heo wrote: > Wrap pio/atapi task queueing in correspondingly named functions. This > change doesn't change anything. It's preparation for follow-up > pio-task/eh sync patch. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo I take back part of what the last email said: I was able to successfully apply patch #12. Patch #13 seems sane, but I would prefer to wait for resend on that one. Haven't reviewed it in depth, just quick glance. Jeff