From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: albertcc@tw.ibm.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] libata: add probeinit component operation to ata_drive_probe_reset()
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 02:02:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43EAE8F3.7000505@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11388720002859-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> This patch adds probeinit component operation to
> ata_drive_probe_reset(). If present, this new operation is called
> before performing any reset. The operations's roll is to prepare @ap
> for following probe-reset operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
[...]
> extern int ata_drive_probe_reset(struct ata_port *ap,
> + ata_probeinit_fn_t probeinit,
> ata_reset_fn_t softreset, ata_reset_fn_t hardreset,
> ata_postreset_fn_t postreset, unsigned int *classes);
Applied patches 3-4, although I dislike that ata_drive_probe_reset() is
growing a ton of function pointer arguments. Please consider a better
approach when you have some free time. Perhaps these need to be added
to ata_port_operations? Perhaps another ata_reset_operations struct?
What do you think?
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-09 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-02 9:20 [PATCHSET] libata: [PATCHSET] libata: new reset mechanism, take#3 Tejun Heo
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 08/11] ata_piix: convert pata to new reset mechanism Tejun Heo
2006-02-09 7:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 03/11] libata: add probeinit component operation to ata_drive_probe_reset() Tejun Heo
2006-02-09 7:02 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-02-09 9:39 ` Tejun
2006-02-09 9:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 05/11] sata_sil: convert to new reset mechanism Tejun Heo
2006-02-09 7:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 06/11] sata_sil24: " Tejun Heo
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 07/11] sata_sil24: add hardreset Tejun Heo
2006-02-09 7:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 02/11] libata: separate out sata_phy_resume() from sata_std_hardreset() Tejun Heo
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 11/11] ahci: add softreset Tejun Heo
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 04/11] libata: implement ata_std_probeinit() Tejun Heo
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 01/11] libata: fix ata_std_probe_reset() SATA detection Tejun Heo
2006-02-09 6:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 09/11] ata_piix: convert sata to new reset mechanism Tejun Heo
2006-02-02 9:20 ` [PATCH 10/11] ahci: convert " Tejun Heo
2006-02-09 6:51 ` [PATCHSET] libata: [PATCHSET] libata: new reset mechanism, take#3 Jeff Garzik
2006-02-09 9:20 ` Tejun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43EAE8F3.7000505@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).