From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: inline ata_qc_complete() Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:53:39 -0500 Message-ID: <43EE6AF3.2060008@pobox.com> References: <11395518482722-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> <43EC8077.4080003@pobox.com> <20060211061349.GA2905@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:54992 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750827AbWBKWx5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:53:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060211061349.GA2905@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: albertcc@tw.ibm.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > This patch inlines ata_qc_complete() and uninlines __ata_qc_complete() > as suggested by Jeff Garzik. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > --- > > Jeff, later EH patches might add one or two more condition tests to > ata_qc_complete(). I don't know whether ata_qc_complete will still > fit as an inline function after EH changes but if it doesn't, it > should be converted then, I guess. This patch is against the current > upstream (489ff4c7d167be954f715128790bd80d3c888322). applied