From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: albertcc@tw.ibm.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ahci: add softreset
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:27:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43EE72D5.1050005@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11396427632078-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Now that libata is smart enought to handle both soft and hard resets,
> add softreset method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> drivers/scsi/ahci.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> 1edad0c8fc8e36457ac1f7c68ba4d86ff63986e3
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ahci.c b/drivers/scsi/ahci.c
> index 86bccb7..a65895f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ahci.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,138 @@ static void ahci_fill_cmd_slot(struct ah
> pp->cmd_slot[0].tbl_addr_hi = cpu_to_le32((pp->cmd_tbl_dma >> 16) >> 16);
> }
>
> +static int ahci_wait_for_bit(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 val,
> + unsigned long interval_msec,
> + unsigned long timeout_msec)
> +{
> + unsigned long timeout;
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + timeout = jiffies + (timeout_msec * HZ) / 1000;
> + do {
> + tmp = readl(reg);
> + if ((tmp & mask) != val)
IMO the sense of this test should be reversed, as the above line of code
is the opposite of what the function name implies.
> + return 0;
> + msleep(interval_msec);
> + } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> +
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +static int ahci_softreset(struct ata_port *ap, int verbose, unsigned int *class)
> +{
> + struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv = ap->host_set->private_data;
> + struct ahci_port_priv *pp = ap->private_data;
> + void __iomem *mmio = ap->host_set->mmio_base;
> + void __iomem *port_mmio = ahci_port_base(mmio, ap->port_no);
> + const u32 cmd_fis_len = 5; /* five dwords */
> + const char *reason = NULL;
> + struct ata_taskfile tf;
> + u8 *fis;
> + int rc;
> +
> + DPRINTK("ENTER\n");
> +
> + /* prepare for SRST (AHCI-1.1 10.4.1) */
> + rc = ahci_stop_engine(ap);
> + if (rc) {
> + reason = "failed to stop engine";
> + goto fail_restart;
> + }
> +
> + /* check BUSY/DRQ, perform Command List Override if necessary */
> + ahci_tf_read(ap, &tf);
> + if (tf.command & (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRQ)) {
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + if (!(hpriv->cap & HOST_CAP_CLO)) {
> + rc = -EIO;
> + reason = "port busy but no CLO";
> + goto fail_restart;
> + }
> +
> + tmp = readl(port_mmio + PORT_CMD);
> + tmp |= PORT_CMD_CLO;
> + writel(tmp, port_mmio + PORT_CMD);
> + readl(port_mmio + PORT_CMD); /* flush */
> +
> + if (ahci_wait_for_bit(port_mmio + PORT_CMD,
> + PORT_CMD_CLO, PORT_CMD_CLO, 1, 500)) {
> + rc = -EIO;
> + reason = "CLO failed";
> + goto fail_restart;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* restart engine */
> + ahci_start_engine(ap);
> +
> + ata_tf_init(ap, &tf, 0);
> + fis = pp->cmd_tbl;
> +
> + /* issue the first D2H Register FIS */
> + ahci_fill_cmd_slot(pp, cmd_fis_len | AHCI_CMD_RESET | AHCI_CMD_CLR_BUSY);
> +
> + tf.ctl |= ATA_SRST;
> + ata_tf_to_fis(&tf, fis, 0);
> + fis[1] &= ~(1 << 7); /* turn off Command FIS bit */
> +
> + writel(1, port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE);
> + readl(port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE); /* flush */
> +
> + if (ahci_wait_for_bit(port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE, 0x1, 0x1, 1, 500)) {
> + rc = -EIO;
> + reason = "1st FIS failed";
> + goto fail;
> + }
> +
> + /* spec says at least 5us, but be generous and sleep for 1ms */
> + msleep(1);
> +
> + /* issue the second D2H Register FIS */
> + ahci_fill_cmd_slot(pp, cmd_fis_len);
> +
> + tf.ctl &= ~ATA_SRST;
> + ata_tf_to_fis(&tf, fis, 0);
> + fis[1] &= ~(1 << 7); /* turn off Command FIS bit */
> +
> + writel(1, port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE);
> + readl(port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE); /* flush */
> +
> + /* spec mandates ">= 2ms" before checking status.
> + * We wait 150ms, because that was the magic delay used for
> + * ATAPI devices in Hale Landis's ATADRVR, for the period of time
> + * between when the ATA command register is written, and then
> + * status is checked. Because waiting for "a while" before
> + * checking status is fine, post SRST, we perform this magic
> + * delay here as well.
> + */
> + msleep(150);
> +
> + *class = ATA_DEV_NONE;
> + if (sata_dev_present(ap)) {
> + if (ata_busy_sleep(ap, ATA_TMOUT_BOOT_QUICK, ATA_TMOUT_BOOT)) {
> + rc = -EIO;
> + reason = "device not ready";
> + goto fail;
> + }
On AHCI, are you sure this busy_sleep is even necessary?
> + *class = ahci_dev_classify(ap);
> + }
> +
> + DPRINTK("EXIT, class=%u\n", *class);
> + return 0;
> +
> + fail_restart:
> + ahci_start_engine(ap);
> + fail:
> + if (verbose)
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ata%u: softreset failed (%s)\n",
> + ap->id, reason);
> + else
> + DPRINTK("EXIT, rc=%d reason=\"%s\"\n", rc, reason);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> static int ahci_hardreset(struct ata_port *ap, int verbose, unsigned int *class)
> {
> int rc;
> @@ -554,7 +686,8 @@ static void ahci_postreset(struct ata_po
>
> static int ahci_probe_reset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes)
> {
> - return ata_drive_probe_reset(ap, NULL, NULL, ahci_hardreset,
> + return ata_drive_probe_reset(ap, ata_std_probeinit,
> + ahci_softreset, ahci_hardreset,
> ahci_postreset, classes);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-11 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-11 7:26 [PATCHSET] ahci: convert to new reset mechanism Tejun Heo
2006-02-11 7:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Tejun Heo
2006-02-11 7:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] ahci: make ahci_fill_cmd_slot() take *pp instead of *ap Tejun Heo
2006-02-11 22:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-11 7:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] ahci: add softreset Tejun Heo
2006-02-11 23:27 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-02-12 4:58 ` Tejun
2006-02-15 6:36 ` [PATCH] " Tejun Heo
2006-02-28 18:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-01 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43EE72D5.1050005@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).