* [PATCH] ata_piix: kill spurious assignment in piix_sata_probe()
@ 2006-02-12 10:05 Tejun Heo
2006-02-12 19:18 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2006-02-12 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik, linux-ide
In piix_sata_probe(), mask gets assigned unnecessarily at the
beginning of the function. Kill the assignment.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
This patch is against
the current upstream (bef4a456b8dc8b3638f4d49a25a89e1467da9483)
+ http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/7967
+ http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/7968 (2 patches)
drivers/scsi/ata_piix.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
Index: work1/drivers/scsi/ata_piix.c
===================================================================
--- work1.orig/drivers/scsi/ata_piix.c 2006-02-12 18:48:31.000000000 +0900
+++ work1/drivers/scsi/ata_piix.c 2006-02-12 18:48:31.000000000 +0900
@@ -425,9 +425,6 @@ static int piix_sata_probe (struct ata_p
int orig_mask, mask, i;
u8 pcs;
- mask = (PIIX_PORT_PRESENT << ap->hard_port_no) |
- (PIIX_PORT_ENABLED << ap->hard_port_no);
-
pci_read_config_byte(pdev, ICH5_PCS, &pcs);
orig_mask = (int) pcs & 0xff;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ata_piix: kill spurious assignment in piix_sata_probe()
2006-02-12 10:05 [PATCH] ata_piix: kill spurious assignment in piix_sata_probe() Tejun Heo
@ 2006-02-12 19:18 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2006-02-12 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: linux-ide
Tejun Heo wrote:
> In piix_sata_probe(), mask gets assigned unnecessarily at the
> beginning of the function. Kill the assignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> This patch is against
> the current upstream (bef4a456b8dc8b3638f4d49a25a89e1467da9483)
> + http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/7967
> + http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/7968 (2 patches)
applied, though this function needs a further look:
1) We should really:
* enable port X via PCS, if not already
* delay a bit, for SATA device detection
* check 'present' bit
* if nothing present, disable port X via PCS
2) In ICH6 and later, according to the docs: PCS enable bits should
always be set, and the port should be controlled via SATA phy registers.
As I noted in another email, ICH6+ should support SATA PHY registers
even if AHCI is disabled. See bit 9 of SIR (94h) register in ICH6 and
ICH7, which enables access to SATA PHY regs.
I am hoping that we can make all ICH6/7 use SATA PHY registers, but I am
worried that in some cases the AHCI BAR may not have been assigned a value.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-12 19:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-12 10:05 [PATCH] ata_piix: kill spurious assignment in piix_sata_probe() Tejun Heo
2006-02-12 19:18 ` Jeff Garzik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).