From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: don't do EDD handling if ->probe_reset is used Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:29:23 -0500 Message-ID: <43EF8C93.9080109@pobox.com> References: <20060212142237.GA7281@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:35290 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750712AbWBLT30 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:29:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060212142237.GA7281@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > EDD is never used with ->probe_reset. Don't handle EDD special case > in ata_dev_identify if ->probe_reset is in use. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > --- > > This patch should have been included in the reset patchset but was > left out somehow, sorry. This patch is generated on top of "misc > preps for configuration reorganization" patchset[1] I've just posted > but also applies over upstream with offset. applied