From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: EH progress summary Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:19:44 +0900 Message-ID: <43F97BA0.1080905@gmail.com> References: <43F93A33.1020809@gmail.com> <43F979CD.2060307@tw.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from pproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.166.182]:18495 "EHLO pproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932156AbWBTITr (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:19:47 -0500 Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i49so1033348pyi for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:19:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <43F979CD.2060307@tw.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: albertl@mail.com Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linux-ide Albert Lee wrote: > Hi Tejun: > >>I think we're half-way through the EH changes. New reset mechanism and >>most of config reorganization are in tree. Currently, the patches which >>are waiting for your review are... >> >>[1] libata: rename ata_dev_id_[c_]string() >>[2] libata: reorganize ata_dev_identify() (7 patches) >>[3] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate() (4 patches) >> >>Once these revalidation changes make into tree, I'll submit >>ata_set_mode() changes (I've submitted the first patchset of this but >>Alan had a valid objection. I agreed and dropped that one.[4]) >> >>After ata_set_mode() changes are complete, the real EH changes will be >>submitted including error recording (to determine whether speed down is >>necessary) and all the recovery actions. > > > Will PATA speed down be supported? > e.g. udma133 => udma100 => udma66 => udma33 => pio ... > Yeap, sure. -- tejun