From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert Lee Subject: Re: EH progress summary Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:27:12 +0800 Message-ID: <43F97D60.7090907@tw.ibm.com> References: <43F93A33.1020809@gmail.com> <43F979CD.2060307@tw.ibm.com> <43F97BA0.1080905@gmail.com> Reply-To: albertl@mail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:12234 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932232AbWBTI1M (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:27:12 -0500 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1K8RCc7009945 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:27:12 -0500 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id k1K8OpA5241548 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:24:51 -0700 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1K8RB0B010869 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:27:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <43F97BA0.1080905@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: albertl@mail.com, Jeff Garzik , Linux-ide Tejun Heo wrote: > Albert Lee wrote: > >> Hi Tejun: >> >>> I think we're half-way through the EH changes. New reset mechanism and >>> most of config reorganization are in tree. Currently, the patches which >>> are waiting for your review are... >>> >>> [1] libata: rename ata_dev_id_[c_]string() >>> [2] libata: reorganize ata_dev_identify() (7 patches) >>> [3] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate() (4 patches) >>> >>> Once these revalidation changes make into tree, I'll submit >>> ata_set_mode() changes (I've submitted the first patchset of this but >>> Alan had a valid objection. I agreed and dropped that one.[4]) >>> >>> After ata_set_mode() changes are complete, the real EH changes will be >>> submitted including error recording (to determine whether speed down is >>> necessary) and all the recovery actions. >> >> >> >> Will PATA speed down be supported? >> e.g. udma133 => udma100 => udma66 => udma33 => pio ... >> > > Yeap, sure. > That's great, thanks! :) Albert