From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate() Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:48:47 -0500 Message-ID: <43F99E8F.6000408@pobox.com> References: <11399977652752-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:12754 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964865AbWBTKsv (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:48:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <11399977652752-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: albertcc@tw.ibm.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Jeff. Hello, Albert. > > This patchset is the fourth and last part of divided 'reorganize > configuration and implement revalidation' patchset[1]. The third part > was posted about half an hour ago[2]. > > This patchset is against > the current upstream (254a5c45f8e53775a1e1dd7498a8dcd665341f1e) > + rename ata_dev_id_[c_]string() patch [3] > + reorganize ata_dev_identify() patchset [2] > > Note: Jeff, I generated patches over the rename patch as the patch > make naming not only shorter but also more consistent. If you > don't like the rename, I'll regenerate this patchset without it. > > This patchset implements ata_dev_revalidate() and use it after > configuring transfer mode. In general the patchset is OK, but there are comments... (see forthcoming emails) Jeff