From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: albertcc@tw.ibm.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] libata: separate out ata_dev_read_id()
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:04:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43F9DA61.40809@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F99B67.5050504@pobox.com>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> Separate out ata_dev_read_id() from ata_dev_identify(). This is the
>> first half of splitting ata_dev_identify(). ata_dev_read_id() will
>> also be used for revalidation. This patch does not make any behavior
>> change.
>>
>> ata_dev_read_id() doesn't modify any of libata-internal data
>> structures. It simply reads IDENTIFY page and returns error code on
>> failure. INIT_DEV_PARAMS and EDD wrong class code are also handled by
>> this function.
>>
>> Re-reading IDENTIFY after INIT_DEV_PARAMS is performed by jumping to
>> retry: instead of calling ata_dev_reread_id(). This is done because
>> 1. there's retry label anyway 2. ata_dev_reread_id() cannot be used
>> anywhere else so there's no reason to keep it.
>>
>> This function is probably the place to set transfer mode to PIO0
>> before IDENTIFY. However, reset -> identify -> init_dev_params order
>> should be kept for pre-ATA4 devices so we cannot set transfer mode
>> before IDENTIFY for them. How do we know if a device is post-ATA4
>> before IDENTIFY?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
>>
>
> I think you should order this patch before the dev->id[0] reworked patch.
Will do.
> In particular, "p_id = id" appears to stomp on the existing dev->id
> allocation.
Hmmm... ata_dev_read_id() is responsible for allocating id array and the
caller is responsible for making sure what p_id points to is
deallocated. e.g. ata_dev_revalidate() frees dev->id before passing it
to ata_dev_read_id(). Seems problemetic?
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-20 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1139995449455-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
2006-02-20 10:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] libata: separate out ata_dev_read_id() Jeff Garzik
2006-02-20 15:04 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43F9DA61.40809@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).