* Re: PATCH: blacklist update
2006-02-20 15:25 PATCH: blacklist update Alan Cox
@ 2006-02-20 20:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-20 22:57 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-25 6:07 ` Chisato Yamauchi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2006-02-20 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-ide
Alan Cox wrote:
> A long time after testing confirmed the SN-124 was ok Klaas Gadeyne
> discovered that early revision N001 is not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
>
>
> --- linux.vanilla-2.6.16-rc4/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c 2006-02-20 11:16:39.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc4/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c 2006-02-20 15:01:02.238144320 +0000
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@
> { "SanDisk SDP3B-64" , "ALL" },
> { "ATAPI CD-ROM DRIVE 40X MAXIMUM", "ALL" },
> { "_NEC DV5800A", "ALL" },
> + { "SAMSUNG CD-ROM SN-124", "N001" },
> { NULL , NULL }
Could you gin up the same patch for libata?
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: PATCH: blacklist update
2006-02-20 15:25 PATCH: blacklist update Alan Cox
2006-02-20 20:38 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2006-03-25 6:07 ` Chisato Yamauchi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chisato Yamauchi @ 2006-03-25 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ide; +Cc: alan
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: PATCH: blacklist update
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:25:17 +0000
> A long time after testing confirmed the SN-124 was ok Klaas Gadeyne
> discovered that early revision N001 is not.
Hi,
I report that the ASI ARAID99 series 1010/1500/2000 (RAID0 mode) have
a problem about UDMA.
Although I've tried using the RAID0 mode of ARAID99 2000
(HDD:Maxtor 6L300S0 x2) connected with Sil3112A, Sil3114, Sil3124,
ICH2(with Marvell PATA->SATA bridge), SiS5513(with Marvell PATA->SATA
bridge) and AMD8111(with Marvell PATA->SATA bridge), since the
beginning of February. Howerver, NONE of DMA modes work... (The PIO4
mode is OK except AMD8111.)
Please add the RAID0 mode of ARAID99 1010/1500/2000 to the blacklist
of liata-core.c and ide-dma.c:
*** drivers/scsi/libata-core.c._orig_ 2006-03-02 07:37:27.000000000 +0900
--- drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2006-03-23 18:58:33.000000000 +0900
***************
*** 2072,2077 ****
--- 2072,2083 ----
}
static const char * ata_dma_blacklist [] = {
+ "ASI ARAID99 2000 Striping Rev:1.20",
+ "ASI ARAID99 2000 Striping Rev:1.10",
+ "ASI ARAID99 1500 Striping Rev:1.20",
+ "ASI ARAID99 1500 Striping Rev:1.10",
+ "ASI ARAID99 1010 Striping Rev:1.20",
+ "ASI ARAID99 1010 Striping Rev:1.10",
"WDC AC11000H",
"WDC AC22100H",
"WDC AC32500H",
*** drivers/ide/ide-dma.c._orig_ 2006-03-23 18:04:44.000000000 +0900
--- drivers/ide/ide-dma.c 2006-03-23 18:58:22.000000000 +0900
***************
*** 101,106 ****
--- 101,112 ----
static const struct drive_list_entry drive_blacklist [] = {
+ { "ASI ARAID99 2000 Striping Rev:1.20", "ALL" },
+ { "ASI ARAID99 2000 Striping Rev:1.10", "ALL" },
+ { "ASI ARAID99 1500 Striping Rev:1.20", "ALL" },
+ { "ASI ARAID99 1500 Striping Rev:1.10", "ALL" },
+ { "ASI ARAID99 1010 Striping Rev:1.20", "ALL" },
+ { "ASI ARAID99 1010 Striping Rev:1.10", "ALL" },
{ "WDC AC11000H" , "ALL" },
{ "WDC AC22100H" , "ALL" },
{ "WDC AC32500H" , "ALL" },
Note that the ARAID99 series(1010,1500,2000) have a common
firmware, so all ARAID99 models must have this UDMA problem.
By the way, the RAID1 mode of ARAID99 has NO PROBLEM about UDMA.
The string of RAID1 mode is something like:
ASI ARAID99 2000 Mirror Rev x.xx
That is, the RAID1 modes are NOT blacklisted in above patch.
== Chisato Yamauchi =================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread