From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Subject: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:28:15 -0500
Message-ID: <4400A1BF.7020109@rtr.ca>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602140439580.3567@p34> <43F2050B.8020006@dgreaves.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602141211350.10793@p34> <200602141300.37118.lkml@rtr.ca> <440040B4.8030808@dgreaves.com> <440083B4.3030307@rtr.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602251244070.20297@p34>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:35504 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161045AbWBYS2O (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:28:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602251244070.20297@p34>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>, David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>

Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Second patch fails for me.
..
> Should I be using 2.6.16-rcX?

Mmm... that's what I'm using (plus other patches),
so, yes.. give that a try.  2.6.16 does seem to
be shaping up to be a nice kernel.

Cheers